Anticipatory Repair: Reframing Breakage through a Futures Agenda. Interview with Minna Ruckenstein and Sarah Pink
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
In this interview, we wanted to explore the notion of repair beyond the usual materialities and temporalities of the present. Therefore, we proposed a conversation between Minna Ruckenstein and Sarah Pink, in order to rethink repair in the digital realm of algorithms, AI, and robotics; as well as to speculate on future breakages, and thus anticipate the kind of repair we might need. The following pages represent our dialogical reflections about the promises of completeness that underpin technological and innovative design, which are nevertheless continually broken through everyday and organizational practice. We delve into algorithmic and robotic breakages and repairs, and their implications for how we understand the relationship between humans and machines. This leads to critical questions about how STS might contribute to a futures-focused research agenda, and specifically, how it might beneficially account for optimistic and hopeful futures. To advance these questions, Minna and Sarah draw on their extensive trajectories of empirical and conceptual research.
Interview conducted by Melisa Duque and Blanca Callén
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International license.
COPYRIGHT NOTICE
All contents of this electronic edition are distributed under the Creative Commons license of "Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 Internacional" (CC-BY-SA). Any total or partial reproduction of the material must mention its origin.
The rights of the published images belong to their authors, who grant to Diseña the license for its use. The management of the permits and the authorization of the publication of the images (or of any material) that contains copyright and its consequent rights of reproduction in this publication is the sole responsibility of the authors of the articles.
References
Duque, M., Pink, S., Mortimer, M., Strengers, Y., Martin, R., Nicholls, L., Horan, B., Eugene, A., & Thomson, S. (2022). Troubleshooting as a Method in COVID-19 Times: Smart Home Ethnographies and Remote Aged Care Innovation. Digital Creativity, 33(3), 188–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/14626268.2022.2088560
Kristensen, D. B., & Ruckenstein, M. (2018). Co-evolving with Self-tracking Technologies. New Media & Society, 20(10), 3624–3640. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444818755650
Mol, A. (2008). The Logic of Care: Health and the Problem of Patient Choice. Routledge.
Pink, S., Korsmeyer, H., Dahlgren, K., Strengers, Y., Martin, R., Kaviani, F., & Nicholls, L. (2022). Digital Energy Futures: Foresights for Future Living [Report]. Emerging Technologies Research Lab (Monash University). https://apo.org.au/node/320975
Pink, S., Salazar, J. F., & Duque, M. (2019). Everyday Mundane Repair: Banknotes and the Material Entanglements of Improvisation and Innovation. Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society, 2(1), 458–477. https://doi.org/10.1080/25729861.2019.1636619
Puig de la Bellacasa, M. (2011). Matters of Care in Technoscience: Assembling Neglected Things. Social Studies of Science, 41(1), 85–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312710380301
Seaver, N. (2019). Knowing Algorithms. In J. Vertesi & D. Ribes (Eds.), DigitalSTS: A Field Guide for Science & Technology Studies (pp. 412–422). Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691190600-028
Willow, A. J. (2023). Anthropological Optimism: Engaging the Power of What Could Go Right. Routledge.