Relevance, Cooperation and Intention. Counterpoint to Sperber and Wilson’s linguistic and communicative perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7764/onomazein.25.09Keywords:
cooperation, evolution, intentionality, principle of relevance, trustAbstract
The principle of relevance of Sperber and Wilson (1995) underestimates the role of cooperation, and the theory’s inclination toward an individual intentionality is problematic. These are two of the critical observations that this paper introduces and discusses. Through a constant counterpoint with the aforementioned authors, the core arguments of their theory are analyzed in each section of this paper. The discussion will allow us to observe why it is necessary to include the notions of cooperation and collective intention in the explanation of the relevance theory, and at the same time, the con-cept of trust. Finally, it is also important to stress the distinction between the informative and argumentative conversational modes to achieve a full understanding of relevance.
Downloads
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2012-06-30 (2)
- 2012-06-30 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2012 Onomázein
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.